(and how not to be a guru whose advice ceases to work after the update)
“Apps may only use public apis and must run on the currently shipping os.” Apple App Review Guidelines
If you have ever started working with a new framework and caught yourself thinking: “Now I’ll understand everything, documentation is for bores”-you are definitely not alone. Many developers have a natural instinct: first try, and only then – read. This is fine.
But it is at this stage that you can easily turn off the right path and find yourself in a situation where the code works … But only today, and only “I have.”
Why is it easy to “figure it out” – is it not enough? h2>
Freimvorki, especially closed and proprietary, are complex and multi -layered. They have a lot of hidden logic, optimization and implementation features, which:
* not documented;
* not guaranteed;
* can change at any time;
* are a commercial secret and can be protected by patents
* contain bugs, flaws that are known only to the developers of the framework.
When you act “on a hunch”, you can easily build architecture in random observations, instead of support on the clearly described rules. This leads to the fact that the code becomes vulnerable to updates and EDGE cases.
Documentation is not a restriction, but support h2>
The developers of frameworks create manuals for a reason – this is an agreement between you and them. While you are acting as part of the documentation, they promise:
* stability;
* support;
* predictable behavior.
If you go beyond this framework – everything that happens next becomes exclusively your responsibility.
Experiments? Certainly. But in the framework of the rules.
Curiosity is the developer’s super -via. Explore, try non -standard, test boundaries – all this is necessary. But there is an important “but”:
You need to experiment in the framework of the documentation and Best Practices.
Documentation is not a prison, but a card. She shows what opportunities are really planned and supported. It is such experiments that are not only useful, but also safe.
Caution: Guru h2>
Sometimes you may encounter real “experts”:
* They conduct courses
* perform at conferences,
* write books and blogs,
* shared “their approach” to the framework.
But even if they sound convincing, it is important to remember:
If their approaches are contrary to documentation, they are unstable.
Such “empirical patterns” can:
* work only on a specific version of the framework;
* be vulnerable to updates;
* Break in unpredictable situations.
Guru is cool when they respect the manuals. Otherwise, their tips must be filtered through official documentation.
A little Solid
Three ideas from Solid principles are especially relevant here:
* Open/Closed Principle: Expand the behavior through a public API, do not go into the insides.
* Liskov Substition Principle: Do not rely on implementation, rely on the contract. Disorders – everything will break when replacing the implementation.
* Dependency Inversion: high -level modules should not depend on low -level modules. Both types should depend on abstractions. Abstraction should not depend on the details. Details should depend on abstractions.
What does this mean in practice? If you use a framework and directly tied to its internal details – you violate this principle.
Instead, you need to build dependence on public interfaces, protocols and contracts that the framework officially supports. This gives:
* the best isolation of your code from changes in the framework;
* the ability to easily test and replace dependencies;
* predictable behavior and stability of architecture.
When your code depends on the details, and not on abstractions, you literally embed yourself in a specific implementation that can disappear or change at any time.
And if the bug? h2>
Sometimes it happens that you did everything right, but it works incorrectly. This happens – frameworks are not perfect. In this case:
* Gather a minimum reproduced example.
* Make sure you use only documented API.
* Send a bug-port-they will definitely understand you and, most likely, will help.
If the example is built on hacks or bypasses, the developers are not required to support it, and most likely your case will simply miss.
How to squeeze the maximum from the framework h2>
* Read the documentation. Seriously.
* Follow the guides and recommendations from the authors.
* Experiment – but within the described.
* Check the tips (even the most famous speakers!) Through the manual.
* Fold bugs with minimal cases and respect for the contract.
Conclusion h2>
Freimvorki are not black boxes, but tools that have the rules of use. To ignore them means writing the code “at random”. But we want our code to live for a long time, delight users, and does not break from the minor update.
So: trust, but check. And yes, read the manuals. They are your superpower.
Sources h2>
https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLID
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTFM